One concept that I found interesting is positive and negative correlation. This type of correlation is a simple tactic you can use to show your point. It shows how two or more variables increase or decrease in number together. There is a relationship between the variables that can help cause and effect arguments. An example of a positive coerraltion is the relationship between the number of hours worked and your paycheck. Obviously the more hourse you work, the higher amount of money you will earn in your paycheck. In an opposite and positive correlation, you would get a higher grade if you attend all class meetings. An example of a negative correlation would be the less days I go to school, the lower my final grade will be. These types of relationships can truly help you figure out the reasons for you situation or argument so I would recommend using this type of tactic.
Sunday, February 19, 2012
Saturday, February 18, 2012
Dr. Novello
Dr. Novello is a respected first Hispanic surgeon. She is against a lot of things that affect a person's health such as smoking and drinking. She was especially concerned with young children and teens choosing not to be above the influence. Being against smoking industries I can kind of see why she attacked their commercial ad compaigns. When statistics showed that young people smoke a lot more, I believe she used cause and effect reasoning to come to her conclusions. Novello believed that because after a smoking commercial first aired the youth smoker rate went up and that the producer for the advertisement was actually targeting young children, the number of children who smoke soared. She used the positive correlations of those premises. This is an inductive arguent because this whole situation is not based on facts but her assumptions. If I had the same beliefs I would attack the commercials as wekk because a majority of people just not kids watch television.
Friday, February 17, 2012
Inductive Argument
An inductive argument is when the premises support the conclusion. However, in an inductive argument, the conclusion sometimes won't always be true when you think about the premises. An example of an inductive argument I had experienced was a couple days ago when I couldn't find my favorite piece of clothing. I had came to the conclusion that my sister had stolen it. My premises are that one, she consistently uses my clothes without asking, and two she always, always lies when I ask if she's taken something and then I catch her putting it back the same day. However, after a couple of days I can now say that she didn't take it because she hasn't returned it. Also, I found the jacket in the trunk of my car a week later. Both of my premises were although true, my conclusion was definitely not true. So as you can see, an inductive argument was rather weak in my situation.
Sunday, February 12, 2012
Leadership
Penalty
Personally I am a Catholic who believes that God is the only one who can choose to have someone leave our world physicially. The statement in the bible is like that saying about how you should treat others how you want them to treat you. If you changed places, what would you want your sentence to be: imprisonment or death? I feel that most people would choose imprisonment. Sure the actions of the person accused may have been drastic and unbearable, but how can they feel the punishment if they're not alive to. They need the time in a locked cell to feel the guilt and sorrow of those who were the loved ones of the vistim or victims. I know that when I hear on the news of someone getting the death penalty I feel almost sad for both the victim and the person who killed him or her. It's not our choice whether someone should live or die because their accused actions may be false.